Writing a Comparison Contrast Essay Sample Title

Writing a Comparison Contrast Essay Sample TitleWhen you are looking for a great assignment to do for your college essay, choosing a comparison contrast essay sample title could be the key. A compare and contrast essay is one of the most highly recommended essay topics when it comes to getting a good grade. The two concepts that the title creates are too perfect to pass up! But how can you decide which one to use?Comparison does not have to mean a negative concept. Consider all the ways that these two topics relate to each other. What could these terms mean to you? For example, if you are an English major, a comparison essay may be about Americans using words such as 'fertile'time,' or 'the state of California.' So you need to find a title that fits both the subject matter and the particular style of writing that you are intending to do.In this case, you need to think of the best contrast to use in your comparison essay. There are several methods for doing this, but the first thing t o consider is how easy or difficult the assignment will be. You can also ask yourself if you are ready to write a complicated piece or not.For example, if you are in your senior year of high school, a comparison essay might be about a science fair project that you put together. This could be about a new drug that has recently been created. Or you might have an essay on how a leader of a club invented something that you see as an important breakthrough. Whatever it is, you need to know that your professor will be looking at your composition and taking into consideration the assignment that you chose.When you look for college essays for your sophomore year, your choices are less limited. This means that you have a whole lot more things to consider. And then the more important question is, 'What's your writing style?' You need to make sure that you have the writing style to match the comparison essay theme.But before you get into this, you should consider why you want to create this es say and what is the best way to use the analysis. You will probably want to analyze the statement to see how it relates to what you are writing about. But there is no harm in writing the analysis as well. It will let you see where you need to go with your essay.This is the first step of creating a specific essay. If you don't take a little time to think about how the subject fits into your writing style, you can end up with a long essay that you are not happy with. But when you know what you are looking for, this simple idea can get you a long way. Of course, you should always read your assigned essay first and see if it is a good fit for you.

Progressivism Opposing Viewpoints Essays - Political Ideologies

Progressivism: Opposing Viewpoints Progressivism: Opposing Viewpoints At the commencement of the twentieth century, a period referred to as progressivism swept through America. Precisely, this era in American history began soon after the Spanish-American War and lasted until the beginning of World War I. At this point in history, America was in turmoil due to internal problems and was in dire need of social reforms. The progressive era was like a golden age for intellectuals who strived to create a nation where each citizen could be given a chance at success and involvement in the government. In the latter portion of the 1800's, America faced an economic depression and encountered problems with industrialization, urbanization, and immigration. Some progressives demanded that the government should be run directly by its people and that the quality of city life should be ameliorated through sanitation improvements, the abolition of child labor, and regulated working hours. America's utmost problem, however, proved to be the overwhelming power that trusts and big business held in the nation. This factor had a leading role in the development of the era of progressivism. In general, progressives basically agreed that trusts must be destroyed; however, there were different solutions among the progressives on the correct remedy to solve this problem. One ideology in the progressive era called the New Nationalism, advocated for an increase of government involvement in order to regulate big businesses. The other ideology called the New Freedom, firmly believed the ?big? in business was the threat to American society; therefore, the role of the government should be to break up trusts and monopolies. Whatever may have been the case, the progressives desired to attack any group of concentrated power in order to bring more accountability to the government of America. Although the progressives had good intentions to reform the nation, some historians, such as Richard M. Abrams, author of The Failure of Progressivism, believe the entire movemen t was a complete failure. On the other hand, other historians, such as Arthur S. Link and Richard L. McCormick beg to differ with Abrams and defiantly defend their own belief in their article entitled Progressivism in History that the movement was indeed successful. After closely reading both of the articles mentioned above, I have come to the conclusion that Abrams's argument proves to be stronger in that it is not as biased and seems to be more sensible than that of Link's and McCormick's. In the article, The Failure of Progressivism, Professor Richard Abrams argues that the entire progressive movement was a failure. First, Abrams initially defines what he believes to have been progressivism by concluding that the progressives expressed a common feeling that government should attempt to moralize the lives of its citizens through a series of reforms. According to Abrams, its followers flowered from various groups including female emancipationists, prohibitionists, the social gospel, conservation advocates, businessmen, and intellectuals. The progressives generally advocated for an efficient government that would implement strict moral values upon its people. Although most people in America had the same views as progressives, Abrams claims that ?[the progressives] also conceived of themselves, with a grand sense of stewardship, as its heralds, and its agents.? He states that the progressives mainly wanted to instill old moral values upon Americans by attempting to assimi late immigrants by forcing them to accept the American way of life. Additionally, they wanted to impose antitrust legislation, job reforms, and direct legislation. However, according to Abrams these goals were tarnished for significant reasons. First of all, the movement failed due to racism that was rampant during this time period. In addition to racism among blacks in the south, anti-Catholicism started appearing throughout the country. According to Abrams, racism hindered the motives of progressivism because there was ?the inability of reform to deliver a meaningful share of the social surplus to the groups left out of the general national progress, and in part the inability of reform to achieve its objective of assimilation and consensus.? Suddenly, different ethnic groups such as the African Americans took a more aggressive approach towards the public to finally stand up for their rights, which further contributed to growing animosity. Moreover, Abrams believes that new scienti fic developments regarding race and culture affected the